In this approach we begin with a church located
strategically that is at the bottom end of decline,
and about ready to close its doors. After three
successive affirmative congregational votes to give
us or their church association complete ownership of
their property, we dis-incorporate the old church for a
rebirth. This is never approached as a church failure, but rather as a new harvest | | cycle. We explain that for a great harvest, sometimes the old growth must be plowed under and planted again.
In this approach we feel the need to move fast, so we will have an already fully funded planter in place with very specific instructions on how to approach the future. This is done so that he does not get bogged down in the past, but rather sets a strong agenda for going forward.
 | | Single Culture Approach- more details coming
|
 | | Single Community Approach- more details coming
|
 | | Church With Attitude Approach- more details coming
|
 | | Multiplication Approach
|
On the articles page, there is a much fuller description of this approach. Let me summarize it in this way for now:
The end picture is church in every way, but yet it looks different and is lean and efficient while getting there.
Weekly church services for all but a regular designated week happen in people's |
| | homes. Once a month all the neighborhood meetings come together for a truly celebratory service using a public facility (usually another evangelical church's building). All the regular functions of church life are developed with the entire group in mind.
Further explanations can be found on the articles page under "Multiplication Church Birthing for Regional Saturation” along with the "Village Model."
(Links to churches planted this way can also be found at Associated Churches.)
 | | The Mother Church
|
The Mother Church Approach can have any number of styles that play out the churches dream, but we will not address them here. Mothering is one of the most effective approaches to the issue of birthing a church. It too however, can be done well or with |
| | disastrous results. It is a myth that a church must be thousands in number for success in this approach. The truth is in timing and the good health of the mother church of any size.
In this approach, conception occurs and gestation happens naturally and over time. The mother church is the matrix which pulls together the building blocks of life for the church to be birthed. There is also a healthy period of time for the mother church to be involved in the early life of the new church and there is an appropriate time for the mother church to let go.
 | | Anglo/Latino Integrated Congregations Development
|
The preferred approach to Latino church planting in our mind is a modified Mother Church plan. We encourage a church that identifies the need to call an associate pastor for Latino ministries. In this model, the non-English speaking family members can be ministered to in a variety of ways, while the English speaking children and other family members can become integrated into the mother church life. The Latino church can easily do business under another name, but still |
| | be under the umbrella of the mother church.
The major difficulties are, of course, funding and finding a qualified Latino pastor. Once again, it is a myth that only very large churches can afford to do this. In fact, once the truth is known, many if not most churches must do something like this in order to make it past the middle of this century.
(See Associated Churches for links to a couple of churches that are doing this well.)
 | | Strategic Mother Church Approach
|
When we are intentionally approaching an area for saturation church planting, we birth the first church with the DNA of intentionally being a matrix for further church birthing in the area. The best model for this is the approach referred to above as the Multiplication Approach. A similar approach is used elsewhere and known as the "Cell Celebration Model".
 | | “If You Start It They Will Come" Approach
|
In our estimation this is the least effective but most often attempted approach. The overall failure rate for all denominations and church planting groups with this style is by far the highest of all approaches today. We will and do use it only because there are some situations where the neighborhood dynamics demand an approach like this.
In this approach a core is developed before a launch date. The planter trains his |
| | team for a church service. A great amount of advertising is done for a "Launch date" about a year into preparation.
The band is ready, the preacher is ready, the greeting team is trained, as are the children’s workers. A school or community center has been rented and the sandwich boards and handouts are ready to tell the story about this new church in town. All that is left is to see how many will come for the launch service. This number on the first Sunday will in all likelihood drop to a third of that amount during the next few months, and that will be the group you begin with.
A very small number of these sandwich board churches survive for one year. Even less survive for five years and if they do survive, near most metropolitan areas in this country, the church will have to grow to be over five hundred before it will be anywhere near building it’s own facility.
This kind of church plant can make it, but there are many pressure points along the way and dynamics that will need to come into play in the process.
(See Associated Churches for a link to churches that are succeeding having used this approach.)
Church Birthing Matrix
|